Blogarama - The Blogs Directory

Web Design Blog Top Sites



Listed in LS Blogs



Blog Flux Directory

Blogz

blog search



British Blog Directory.

Blog search

Link With Us - Web Directory

FindingBlog - Blog Directory

iPod nano, small size… big value

Friday, 9 December 2005 : Filed under: Electronic Reviews E-Mail This Article

There’s a new iPod on the scene—the iPod nano—and you need one. What follows are our first impressions of this very impressive little player.

The iPod nano comes in two colors (white and black) and two configurations ($199 for 2GB, and $249 for 4GB). Each model stores music on a memory card rather than a hard drive, very crisp color display, and—like current full-sized iPods and the now-old iPod mini—sports a click wheel. Unlike with other iPod models, you’ll find the headphone port on the bottom of this iPod, next to the dock connector. The Hold switch remains, all alone, on the iPod nano’s top.

The nano is as thin and light as Steve Jobs says, weighing just 1.5 ounces, and is as thick as a stack of six credit cards. Despite its small size, the markings on the click wheel are clear and the click wheel is responsive. The screen really does look awesome—it’s very bright and readable. And the nano feels perkier than my other iPods, scrolling very quickly through a window full of songs, moving rapidly from one screen to the next, and flying through pictures.

In the iPod nano’s narrow box you’ll find the iPod itself, a USB 2.0 cable, Apple’s earbuds, two sets of foam covers for the earbuds, and an iPod Dock Adapter—a white plastic insert that will fit in future iPod dock connector accessories.

I can hardly wait until the next generation of iPods.

reviewed by: Dean Sauls

iPod nano review

very good review
overall rating: very good
Get an iPod Nano

1 Comment »

  1. I just really like that b’eaw wound up on a page with a cool red robot. Thank you for the kind shout-out.

    My two-year-old is obsessed with robots and will think Mommy is uber-cool.

    Comment by Jenn — December 9, 2005 @ 1:29 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment